|
Research |
![]() |
Incentives, Institutions, Property Rights |
![]() |
Entrepreneurship, Human Capital,
Industrial Organization, Growth |
![]() |
Other |
Incentives, Institutions, Property Rights
"Formal Incomes and Actual Wealth: Evidence from Moscow Income and Car Ownership Databases" (with Sergey Mityakov and Adrey Liscovich). The paper looks into income reporting in the imperfect institutional environment and tries to quantify the magnitude of income going unreported by matching taxable income reports with car purchases data. We are looking both at overall income underreporting and at how it is different between public and private sector, by occupation and by ethnical groups. Will be available on-line soon.
"The Fortunes of Post-Communist Business Elite in Russia: Oligarchic Capitalism and Political Risk". A detailed microeconomic look at Russian business leaders of the 1990s: how they earned their fortunes (wealth) and what fortunes (fate) awaited them after that. I make an attempt at assessing the quantitative impact of various factors, such as pre-reform background, close-knit ties, political connections, ethnicity, influence with the media, more or less open income reporting, and so on. Will be available on-line soon.
"The Rise and Fall of Post-Communist Oligarchs: Quantitative Analysis". Forthcoming in Journal of Law and Economics (April 2009). Russian transition has not been a revolutionary jump from the totalitarian order to an ideal market economy and democracy but an incremental process that has so far resulted in a hybrid system aptly called “oligarchic capitalism”. We study the evolution of the first postcommunist oligarchy through examining the careers of 296 most prominent first-wave postcommunist business tycoons. We find that 43 percent of them consisted of “insider oligarchs” deriving their status from privileged nomenklatura background dating back to the previous regime. The rest were "outsider oligarchs" who did not have such background. Compared to insider oligarchs, the outsider oligarchs were younger, had higher-quality human capital and were disproportionately Jewish. Their first major business success tended to happen in sectors neglected in the planned economy. But the overwhelming majority of them subsequently developed their own special relationship with the government. It appears that instead of changing the rules of the social-economic game, the new entrants were themselves changed by those rules. On-line Appendix (data) On-line Appendix (anecdotes).
"A
Macroeconomic Model of Russian Transition: The Role of Oligarchic
Property Rights" (with
Roger Myerson), Spreadsheet. Economics of
Transition, 15 (1), 2007, pp. 77-107. This
paper
offers a parsimonious model of the steep decline and subsequent
recovery of the Russian economy during its transition to a market
economy by the phenomenon of oligarchic property rights and the fact
that the "oligarchs" were initially very short on safe assets abroad.
Incentives
and
Institutions. The Transition to a Market Economy in Russia
"Enforcement
of Property Rights during the Russian Transition: Problems and Some
Approaches to a New Liberal Solution", Journal of Legal Studies,
Vol. 28, No. 2, 1999, 515-544. An analysis of failure of public
property rights protection and its negative consequences for economic
efficiency. Policy proposals contained in this paper were reflected in
the Presidential program of my friend Yavlinsky
when he ran for office in 2000 (unfortunately, he did not win).
"Democracy
and Economic Reform: Theory and Some Evidence from the Russian Case", Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 16,
No. 2, 1998, 227-240.
"Producer's
Behavior
in Transition Economy - Theoretical and
Empirical Analysis with Special Application to the Russian Economy", Economic
Systems, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1997, 265-295.
"Corruption and Schumpeterian Growth in Different Economic Environments", Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1996, 14-25.
"The
State and the Market in the Planned and Post-Planned Economy - the Case
of the
Former Soviet Union and Russia", chapter 6 in The State and the Economic Process,
edited by C.W.M.Naastepad
and S.Storm, Edwar
Elgar, 1996, 177-207.
"The
Inefficiency of
Laissez-Faire in
Entrepreneurship, human capital,
industrial organization, growth"Where
Does Entrepreneurship Pay?
Returns
to Ability in Technology-Oriented vs. Non-Technology Oriented
Businesses" (with Atsushi Ohyama),
Revised January 2008. Is starting
an independent business the last resort for misfits or does
it give an opportunity for most talented workers to maximize the return
to
their human capital? We propose a
theoretical framework that encompasses both these views, and we tackle
it as an
empirical question by employing the NSF data on science and engineering
workforce. Highly talented individuals
sort themselves into entrepreneurship in occupations that are
technology-oriented, while misfits get pushed into running independent
businesses in occupations that are non-technology oriented. The theory also predicts that in
technology-oriented
occupations, less experienced entrants into entrepreneurship would be
those
with exceptionally high ability. We then
demonstrate empirically that entrepreneurship generates considerable
conditional mean and median pecuniary returns as compared to paid work
in
technology-oriented occupations and we find evidence of positive
self-selection
among entrepreneurs in these occupations, especially among less
experienced
workers. In contrast, among scientists
and engineers whose business ventures are non-technology oriented, the
entrepreneurial earnings differential is negative, in line with
findings in the
previous literature, and there is also evidence of negative selection. On-line Appendix
This paper
is
part of the research project "Entrepreneurial
Activity and Economic Change" funded by the Kauffman Foundation (joint also with Michael Gort and
Seoung-Hoon Lee).
"The Role of Openness in Industry Dynamics: A Model of Innovation and Technology Diffusion With Different Market Sizes" (with Salavat Gabdrakhmanov, Atsushi Ohyama and David C. Rose), Revised November 2007. We propose a new theoretical model linking the degree of openness of an economy to innovation and technology diffusion. The degree of openness to trade affects the size of the market faced by the domestic industry and therefore the optimal decision of domestic innovators about how much to invest in innovation and whether to prevent industry-wide knowledge spillovers. We show that the optimal investment path involves allowing for spillovers while the competitors’ output is small relative to the market, so that their imitation does not reduce the price and thus profits by much. As the industry grows and price-destruction effects become more pronounced, it becomes profitable to switch to protecting secrecy. Using this framework, we demonstrate that if a country tries to adopt protectionist measures, technology diffusion typically stops before the industry can compete at world prices, so that such a policy is likely to be self-defeating. On the other hand, an industry may initially grow more slowly under free trade, but will be able to sustain the diffusion of innovations at least until it becomes globally competitive.
"Noisy Selection Model and the Evolution of Within-Firm Salary Earnings and Firm Size Distributions" (with Atsushi Ohyama), April 2007. Striking parallels are observed in the evolution of within-firm salary earning and firm size distributions over time. At the time of entry, the distribution of the whole sample and that of eventual survivors look similar but the distribution of survivors subsequently shifts to the right. The left tails thins out and the right tail thickens, and both the mode and the mean increase. We demonstrate that these empirical findings are consistent with the noisy selection model.
"Allocation
and Misallocation of Human Capital: Some Lessons from Japan and Russia".
Buffalo Legal Studies Research
Paper Series No. 2005-01.
Presented at a
multi-disciplinary workshop "The Mystery of
Capital and the Construction of Social Reality", University at
Buffalo, September 2004.
Accepted for publication
as a chapter in the book The Mystery of Capital
and the New Philosophy
of Social Reality (Open Court).
"A Theory of Industry Dynamics With Innovation and Imitation" (with Salavat Gabdrakhmanov and Atsushi Ohyama), Reivew of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2007, 729-760. We show that industries at early stages of the life-cycle will be tend to have not only competitive innovations but also a lot of knowledge spillovers that will lead to fast growth. As this growth contiues, the price-destruction effects from new entry will force innovators to start spending resources on preventing knowledge spillovers, slowing down industry-wide growth and causing a possible shake-out.
"Capital and Growth with
Oligarchic
Property Rights" (with Roger Myerson), Reivew of
Economic Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 4,
2007, 676-704.
Appendix,
Spreadsheet.
To analyze effects of
imperfect property rights
on economic growth, we consider economies where some fraction of
capital can be
owned only by local oligarchs, whose status is subject to political
risk. Political risk decreases local
capital and
wages. Risk-averse oligarchs acquire
safe foreign assets for insurance, thus increasing wages in other
countries
that protect outside investors. Reforms
to decrease political risk or to protect more outsiders' investments
can
decrease local oligarchs' welfare by increasing wages. Cornell
presentation
"Bidder
Discounts and Target Premia in Takeovers" (with Boyan Jovanovic). American Economic Review,
Vol. 94, No. 1, 2004,
46-56. On news of a takeover, the sum of the stock-market values of the
firms involved often falls, and the value of the acquirer almost always
does. Does this mean that takeovers do not raise the values of the
firms involved? We set up a model in which the equilibrium number of
takeovers is constrained efficient. Yet, upon news of a takeover, a
target’s price rises, the bidder’s price falls, and, most of the time
the joint value of the target and acquirer also falls.
“Entrepreneurial
Ability and Market Selection in an Infant Industry: Evidence from the
Japanese Cotton Spinning Industry” (with Atsushi Ohyama
and Kevin
M.Murphy). Review
of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2004, 354-381. In this
paper we
develop a new insight into the process of learning in an infant
industry, in a
setting where entrepreneurs are differentiated by talent. The learning
rate
depends on the quality of ideas, not on the scale of the industry, and
a
competitive open economy regime may furnish a better environment for
innovation-led
industrial growth even in the presence of industry-wide increasing
returns to
scale. Competitive market selection of ablest entrepreneurs forms a
crucial
condition for successful industrialization. The model is tested against
the
evidence of the industrial revolution in
"Human
Capital" (with Michael
Intriligator and Vitaly
Shvydko), Chapter 26 in The New
OtherInvited
Contributions to The Encyclopedia
of Capitalism, in three volumes, Facts on File,
Political
Economy:
Problems and Ways of Renovation (in
Russian) (with Yakov Pevzner),
Monetary
Policy in